ADJUDICATION OFFICER DECISION/RECOMMENDATION
Adjudication Reference: ADJ-00004077
Parties:
| Complainant | Respondent |
Anonymised Parties | Cashier | Oriental Shop |
Complaint:
Act | Complaint/Dispute Reference No. | Date of Receipt |
Complaint seeking adjudication by the Workplace Relations Commission under section 24 of the National Minimum Wage Act, 2000 | CA-00005786-001 | 11/07/2016 |
Date of Adjudication Hearing: 10/04/2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Eugene Hanly
Location of Hearing: Room G.06 Lansdowne House
Procedure:
In accordance with Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act, 2015, following the referral of the complaint to me by the Director General, I inquired into the complaint and gave the parties an opportunity to be heard by me and to present to me any evidence relevant to the complaint.
Background:
The Complainant was employed as a cashier from 10th March 2016 to 11th July 2016. She was paid €300.00 per week and worked 36 hours per week. She has claimed that she was not paid the national minimum wage. |
Summary of Complainant’s Case:
DID NOT ATTEND |
Summary of Respondent’s Case:
DID NOT ATTEND |
Findings and Conclusions:
I note correspondence on file advising both parties of the venue, date and time of the hearing. I note that neither party to this complaint attended the hearing. I find that the Complainant did not prosecute her complaint. |
Decision:
Section 41 of the Workplace Relations Act 2015 requires that I make a decision in relation to the complaint(s)/dispute(s) in accordance with the relevant redress provisions under Schedule 6 of that Act.
I have decided that as no complaint was prosecuted on the day of the hearing the complaint fails for want of prosecution. |
Dated: 15th May 2017
Workplace Relations Commission Adjudication Officer: Eugene Hanly
Key Words:
|